If you can escape in your head, you wouldn’t need to escape your head. There can be all sorts of worlds in there, parallel adjacent and loopy. People can’t exist if you don’t allow them to and people can exist who no longer do and people can exist that aren’t people and people can exist that never were. All the possibilities inside your head couldn’t be calculated by a permutation known to the intellect of man, you can get lost there all you want to as soon as you know how to find your way back, and if you have nothing to go back to then I guess you needn’t even worry about that.
Let there be a world where all are homesick, and neither knows the other exists. A world where Babel happened on an individual level rather than tidily on imaginary lines of maps. Let there be a world where all are kind because they don’t know anyone else is there; they’re kind not out of choice, but out of trying to make their own company bearable.
But no, I’m not good at this. That’s no different than real life.
Let there be a world where there are coffee fountains every where, a world where there are coffee beans instead of soil and the birds never sleep, are always chirpy and drop dead every 72 hours of caffeine overdose.
But no, that wouldn’t work, they’d cause an epidemic and everyone would eventually die.
Let there be a world where people daydream for a living and live in their daydreams, and form families and loved ones by the rare occasions when their dreams overlap in nature and desired comfort.
But no, that’s not fair. Where’s the choice in that? And people would be forced to lose their families and loved ones without prior notice if they dare dream differently.
Let there be a world where everything makes sense, where numbers and formulas work out people and politics, functions work out relationships and interactions, permutations cause the necessary number of accidents required to reclaim cosmic order and integration resets values when they get too astronomical and eventually keep their world grounded.
But no, that would fail because people would never know what it’s like to get a useless lottery ticket, bet on a live horse race or experience an adrenaline rush. They’d never fail so they’d always fail, by always winning and never knowing what it is.
Let there be a world where people never grow up, die or procreate, a world of eternal youth where nothing wilts or expires, nothing is outdated and the concept of time isn’t paired with the dreaded concept of its consequences.
But no, how would people be alive if they didn’t have the ability to destroy? How could they properly love if they had an annoying aeonian wall of skin and an eternity put on hold between them? What would it matter to live or to love if they couldn’t accidentally or intentionally destroy it?
Let there be a world where people are clones, they all think the same way and they all feel the same way. The entire race is propagating on the same wavelength steadily towards the unknown.
But no, that would backfire a couple of weeks in when they all simultaneously PMS or three weeks in when they simultaneously fuck. If they survive both, they’ll die four weeks in when they panic about getting there too quickly.
Let there be a world where all forms of life are omnivores, where all sentient creatures feed without bias or prejudice, without sentiment or lack thereof, a dynamic equilibrium following a constant function with equal mathematical losses on all sides involved. A perfect symmetry of survival and equal odds for all.
But no, that would annul the concept of family and pets, of homes and siblings and of recreational activity. The young will never have a dog for the same reason they never had a baby, and the old will never go into gardening for the same reason they never dated. That would mess with their odds.
Let there be a world where people had a life span of one-week and they knew it, with no chance of regeneration or redemption. They were born to die and had no other purpose, they deserved no more than they were entitled and their quotas were equally rationed.
But no, that wouldn’t work because one or two will decide to take everything down with them in a final evening of odds. Soon enough, the world will be consumed and the later generations will come into nothing, a certain life of nothing instead of a possible life of some things with odds of nothing.
Let there be a world where all forms of life could effectively communicate, with no bridges in notion or gaps in progress. Each species climbed their respective evolutionary ladders at the rate allowed by their world’s timeframe, that is constant for all.
But no, they would spend millennia discussing their rights, millennia trespassing each others’ and all the while trumping each others’ progress so that the only constant in a world of variables, being time, is invalidated.
I guess the only way this world could feel less chaotic is by realizing how its chaos is peculiarly durable.